Beyond the Soul’s Meridian April 7, 2021
Recently, one of my patients asked me to write a response to six questions posed to two practicing physicians. These physicians are acquaintances of his son and part of a younger generation of conventionally trained practitioners. My patient is a middle-aged father and fundamentally opposed to receiving the experimental RNA injections that the media is touting as safe and therapeutic. Within the middle-age demographic there is significant push-back to the official narrative along with a healthy level of suspicion that the COVID agenda is far more insidious than the media is portraying it as.
What I am witnessing through my practice is both shocking and unethical. What is most concerning is that those who are opposed to the experimental injections are being strong-armed by their children, friends, and employers into receiving them. This is done by threats of separation, isolation, and exclusion by the younger generations and the fearful who have been programmed to believe that their logic (which is the media’s logic) is based upon variables that are sincere. The mind control that has been spoon fed into all of us since birth has conditioned ego to a level of arrogance that borders on misogyny.
The sad reality is that there is a generational gap between those with and without life experience. It is a crime that our younger generations have been programmed to accept information through platforms that society and educational systems have conditioned them to use.
Like many patients of my generation, there is resistance to the current acceptance of the thoroughly untested “mRNA” injections that are being touted as therapeutic vaccines by the conventional media. What is terribly sad in all of this is the lack of critical analysis that the so called educated younger generations intrinsically lack. The response of these “doctors” to the questions asked in earnest, exposes their sheer lack of awareness that something beyond the official COVID narrative is at play. In part, this is because they have all been rewarded to parrot the “right” answers that their education has programmed them to know.
As our government became controlled by international business interests, legislation in the form of No Child Left Behind and Common Core were passed, crippling our children’s capacity to think critically. It is through Microsoft technology which plays the essential role in packaging information that is presented to our children as “truth.” Through draconian systems of testing, our children have never been “rewarded” for going outside of the narratives that they have all been habitually exposed to since birth.
These are the questions my patient asked:
“Here are the 6 questions you asked me about the COVID-19 vaccine as answered by 2 different doctors.
Doctor 1: M. M., MD Gastroenterology
Doctor 2: L. B., DO Department of Neurology
1) If the new Covid vaccine is not a vaccine why are they calling it a vaccine?
Doctor 1: So the first question is a bit of semantics as to what you Define as a vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine is a vaccine in the sense that it is a subcutaneous injection that promotes immunity to a disease. It differs from traditional vaccines in that instead of injecting an antigen that the body recognizes and creates antibodies to, it instead injects mRNA that the body’s ribosomes make copies of to promote immunity. Although this is a novel method to create immunity, this technology has been around for some time and it’s been studied extensively. That plays into why it was developed so fast.
Doctor 2: The definition of vaccine is a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease. By definition, Covid vaccine = vaccine lol
2) How can they guarantee something with such a small trial period?
Doctor 1: The first answer also starts to answer the second question. The other reason it was developed so fast is that normally the rate limiting step in drug development is bureaucratic red tape and financial limitations, neither of which were at play with the development of these vaccines because governments lifted them. However the important safety standards that go into drug development including having multiple phases of clinical trials were still at play in the development of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Doctor 2: Yes, funding usually runs out and vaccines take forever to be passed through. Guaranteeing that something works in the short term is easy, but again we don’t know about long term effects yet. The new aspect (the mrna) has been known about for years, just never had the money to see it through.
3) How can they know it won’t have long term effects?
Doctor 1: It would be unusual for a vaccine to have long-term effects, I can’t think of any in any other vaccine (autism from vaccines is a hoax) having long-term effects. With that said, it’s possible that it does have long-term effects that I don’t know. It’s also possible that COVID-19 has long-term effects that we don’t know. It’s a risk benefit type of thing. Considering that COVID-19 can even kill one person and the vaccine has not, I would favor the vaccine over no vaccine.
Doctor 2: You won’t know for sure if it wont have long term effects. But I’d rather not run the risk of getting covid which I know has reliable data that has long term effects (pulmonary scarring/fibrosis, decreased lung volumes).
4) My Dad’s doctor is not recommending Covid vaccine but is recommending another vaccine from the mumps era which is supposed to boost immunization and soften the blow. Should he get that instead? Should he get that in addition to the new vaccines (Moderna/Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson)?
Doctor 1: I have never heard of this alternative vaccine. I strongly recommend not getting this alternative vaccine. That is actually my strongest recommendation over not getting any vaccine at all.
Doctor 2: I can’t speak fact on other immunizations that are not meant for covid to prevent covid. But honestly? that makes no sense to me. You have to have a specific piece of the bacteria/virus that you want to kill otherwise your body would kill your own cells. I trust Dr. Fauci and his recs. They’d have to do their own research there.
5) How do they know you won’t die from Covid with newer vaccines (Moderna/Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson) if you catch it again?
Doctor 1: The point of the vaccine is to reduce mortality and severity of COVID-19. I think the efficacy is somewhere around 92% to 95% which is good, not perfect. For a vaccine that’s exceptional. It’s like someone offering a pill that reduces your risk of colon cancer by 95%. You could still get cancer, but would you not take it?
Doctor 2: It’s also possible to die from polio even though you get the vaccine . Yet here we are.
6) What do you do about other Covid strands? Why would you get the new vaccine if you can just get a different strand of Covid?
Doctor 1: I don’t think there’s enough data to answer the last question, but people think there’s still a good amount of overlap between these variants. But I think the same point goes as above, if you had a pill that could do a really good job preventing one type of colon cancer and it might protect you from other types of colon cancer but we aren’t quite sure and it otherwise appears to be very safe, would you not take that pill?
Doctor 2: It’s like the flu vaccine. Even if it’s not 100% effective, the new strain is a version of the original, and some parts that the vaccine is made to ID likely will still be in that strain too… Making it likely that you wouldn’t get as sick even if you did get the new strain. It’s not an absolute, but that’s how we think of it.”
In their responses they are blissfully ignorant of the fact that people are being severely injured and dying from the RNA injections. As Doctor #1 states in question #3:
“It’s a risk benefit type of thing. Considering that COVID-19 can even kill one person and the vaccine has not, I would favor the vaccine over no vaccine.”
Even Bill Gates (who is a eugenicist and chief principle behind these injections) acknowledges that they will kill over a million people with the vaccine if “everyone” gets the shot. This does not include injuries which will be magnitudes in number higher.
Answers to Question #2 regarding long-term safety are painful to read. As Doctor #1 state:
“The first answer also starts to answer the second question. The other reason it was developed so fast is that normally the rate limiting step in drug development is bureaucratic red tape and financial limitations, neither of which were at play with the development of these vaccines because governments lifted them. However the important safety standards that go into drug development including having multiple phases of clinical trials were still at play in the development of the COVID-19 vaccine.”
This is a spoon-fed answer framed by the hollow arguments that the globalist-controlled media propagates. Keep in mind that anyone who receives these injections are part of this global experiment that guarantees no health benefits, only risk and side effects.
Reading through the rest of the answers by these young physicians, it is difficult if not impossible for an enlightened person to engage in their responses at a comprehensive level because they demonstrate a knowledge base that is extremely shallow. They are simply regurgitating the programming that they have become pathologically addicted to. Going beyond the boundaries of their education will trigger anxiety and hostility, which I can personally attest to.
For the last twenty-five plus years (until the lock-down) I have been involved directly in the education of medical students and residents at Southern Illinois University, Rush University, and Midwestern University. Since COVID, my views have been deemed unconventional by corporate controlled medicine and I am now on hiatus from teaching services so that I will not taint or confuse the students. Virtually all academic and corporate controlled medicine has accepted the deceptive narrative that is being spun by their globalist handlers.
Views on masking and social distancing are outrageous and offensive to common sense. Virtually 80 years of empirical research has been negated through the globalist agenda of revisionism. There have been at least four prominent studies in 2020 looking at the mask issue all coming to the same conclusions, they do not work and most likely will make the wearer and society less healthy. This once again reinforces the previous 80 years of research. Furthermore, there is no theoretical science to back-up the distorted logic that even the best masks available (such as 3M’s N95) could possibly filter 100-120 nanometer sized particles. Yet somehow even the allegedly “educated” accept the claim that masks screen particles magnitudes in size smaller than its matrix can filter without any shred of scientific evidence.
What many educated people accept as truth (even in my profession) is simply conjecture or downright deception uttered by individuals that the globalist-controlled media and medical industrial complex tells them to pay attention to. Academia (and all of society) operates upon a system of hierarchy. In this Hierarchy, we have been programmed through an educational system that tells us that there is only one right answer which is ALWAYS disseminated through sanctified experts and resources. Perhaps the most egregious example of this type of conditioned programming is found within the system that has been adopted in medical education.
Today, all students are programmed to followed sanctified resources which are controlled by the medical industrial complex. Due to an inhumane way that students are tested and rewarded for choosing the best-right–answer (and that is a real term used in testing), they have been conditioned to drink from only specific wells of information that have been sanctified by the industry.
Most doctors cannot find the time to do their own research and are conditioned to reflexively rely on groups, organization, or alleged experts (such as Dr. Fauci!!??!!) to tell them what they need to know. Most physicians and scientists cannot think for themselves because they have been programmed since childhood not to do so. God help the few that seek validation by doing their own research into the matter, because they will be ostracized and punished by the auspices of their own vocation.
The other issue is censorship. It is highly unlikely that these physicians in question, or family members are aware that anything drawing alternative conclusions regarding the origins, therapy, or alleged immunizations about COVID is being removed or blocked from major media outlets, search engines, and social media. So, finding information that is contrary to the official narrative is arduous, and what can be found in virtually all instances is eventually removed from circulation. One could make the argument that instead of listening to the corporate controlled media, they should be reading Orwell and Huxley. At minimum, they should be doing their own research through the benchwork source information published within the foundational science and not the second or third level journals that cherry pick and regurgitate corporate sponsored facts that are aligned to the narrative.
Because the less evolved will not find resources of inspired truth within the slickly packaged outlets that the globalists have conditioned our children to look within, they are blinded to truth’s existence. Refuting or attacking answers in a line-item fashion through egotistical logic is not in the world’s best interest in promoting the ascension of human consciousness.
It is always best to let their actions and words speak for themselves. As the result of their programming, our younger generations have no interest or capacity to discern truth from deception because they have never been rewarded for being outspoken and standing for something greater than universal deceit.
This COVID experience is a learning exercise based upon free will. Regardless of our personal views on the COVID pandemic, I would suggest to all physicians that they are bound by two distinct codes of conduct.
The first is the Maxim of Non-Maleficence, which is related to the Hippocratic creed to Do No Harm. Looking at the dangers that these new EXPERIMENTAL RNA modification injections have already demonstrated, medical ethics determine that they should not be administered. At least 20 countries (Scandinavia, South Africa, Austria, Germany, etc.) have stopped distributing these shots due to unacceptable side effects, irreversible injuries, and death. Yet, in other countries they are still being administered. Why? The main reason is that they remain experimental and that there is no accountability or legal recourse for any injury sustained by these injections. The package insert tells the receiver of these injections that there can very well be severe side effects and complications.
Furthermore, the animal studies (ferrets and domestic cats) demonstrated that these injections were lethal when the lab animal was exposed to the same pathogen that they were allegedly protected against. They died from ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement reactions) which is a well-known side effect in these types of injections. ADE reaction has been the reason why many vaccinations have never been implemented and there is no proof what-so-ever that this reaction will not occur within those who have received it. Even in well-designed vaccines (which the RNA modulators are not) only time will prove their merit. Until the COVID “pandemic” there has never been a vaccine release to the United States public within less than seven years of scientific observation to validate its safety.
The second code of conduction is related to the practice of Informed Consent. This means that before any medical practitioner does any type of therapy or procedure they must have consent from the person that they are attempting to treat. This centers around the concept of FULL DISCLOSURE, meaning the patient must be given ALL the facts regarding treatment.
Furthermore, the patient must decide without coercion, what is in their best interests. This means that the practitioner cannot project their values and bias upon the person that they are attempting to treat. The patient must be allowed to make these decisions based upon all known variables and relate this to their own personal value and judgment. They cannot be strong-armed into making any decisions that go against their own intrinsic intentions. This is based upon higher inalienable rights gathered through spiritual and constitutional practice which mandate that we are free to do what we best see fit as long as our free will does not transgress against another.
In addition, egregious ethical violations exist regarding conflicts of interest. The most ardent and adamant supporter of these injections have the most to gain financially from its acceptance and global distribution. This may be just a tip of an iceberg as those who are involved with the research, development, and deployment of these shots are unabashedly and undeniably tied to globalist agendas bound to eugenic philosophies and practices. This fact alone is suspicious for alternative agendas aggressively pushing these injections. This transgression in ethical practice should be viewed as the epitome of violating the second foundational code of conduct because it is flagrantly aligned with bias and coercion.
Anyone who violates these principles is not a physician practicing within ethical boundaries, and therefore is not a DOCTOR, but merely a technocrat controlled by forces that are beyond the scope of the practitioner’s knowledge. The word “doctor” is derived from the Latin “docere” which means “to teach.” We heal through truth and if we teach improperly, or propagate deceptive and harmful practices, karma holds us personally responsible for the pain and suffering that is inflicted upon the souls of others regardless of our ego’s intention. Karma entangles us to the outcome of our patient’s well-being, and we must be careful not to let our bias coerce anyone into making decisions that are not in their best interests, even if the patient decides on a pathway that goes against the practitioner’s best judgement.
I can personally attest to the side effects and injuries that are being inflicted upon my patients by these irresponsible and unscrupulous RNA injections administer by the ignorant and ethically challenged technocrats wittingly or unwittingly aligned with this globalist pandemic agenda. Our small practice has seen severe inflammatory responses (quite common) lasting for weeks, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, non-traumatic brain injury, and severe decline in cognitive abilities, all related directly to the injection.
Understand that the medical industry acknowledges that these RNA injections are experimental and promises virtually no health benefits from receiving them. Furthermore, by United States patent law, they do not qualify as vaccines.
In conclusion, it is free will that determines our path. If one chooses to be an experimental lab animal, then it is your right to do so, that is if you are informed of all the potential risks without bias or deception. We are not slaves to deception and victims of coercion, but sovereign beings aligned to our higher principles. We should aspire to always live within the parameters of compassion for it is only the spiritually inept who transgress against others by their sheer ignorance of their ego’s limitation.
Human beings were never designed to live healthy lives within the construct of deception, conflict, and egotistical control.
If there are any further questions of comments, I am available to address them.
Please read Dr. Michael Chossudovsky’s (professor emeritus) e-book on the matter. His reputation as a credible scholar on globalization and its effect upon human health and well-being is impeccable.
Consider Dr. David E. Martin’s analysis on the (il)legal issues of the RNA injection.
Also consider Dr. Lee Martin’s insights and analysis of these issues, that is if you can find it! This might be a place to start.
Consider the Medicalveritas.org article on the nano electric hydrogel technology concealed within the RNA injections that has the potential to manipulate intrinsic control of our neuro-immune system.
FEDERAL LAWSUIT VETS COVID CONCEALMENTS INCLUDING CHARLES LIEBER’S CONNECTIONS TO THE PLAGUE, THE PLOT, and PSYCHOTRONIC WARFARE (i.e., WIRELESS MIND-CONTROL)
Virtually all other information from independent sources opposing the RNA modulation injections is being scrubbed from the net!